Nilges Legal Group LLC

Blog / Posts

The EEOC nullifies its policy statement against mandatory workplace arbitration

filing law

Some employers may require new employees to enter into mandatory arbitration agreements, which prevent claims from being handled in court. Arbitration agreements also reduce many of the legal rights afforded to employees by federal law. Instead, workplace incidents are handled internally. By requiring employees to enter into mandatory arbitration agreements, employers may be able to avoid lawsuits relating to workplace discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a policy statement in 1997 called Mandatory Binding Arbitration of Employment Discrimination Disputes as a Condition of Employment. The policy statement strongly opposed mandatory arbitration agreements in the workplace. It asserted that it "harms both the individual civil rights claimant and the public interest in eradicating discrimination. "

Does EEOC's policy statement conflicts with federal law?

The EEOC concluded that arbitration agreements avert the enforcement of federal laws against workplace discrimination. They also prevent the courts from properly interpreting the laws and protecting workers. On December 17, 2019, the EEOC nullified its policy statement due to conflict with current arbitration laws.

In 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that employment arbitration was enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act â€” which was signed into law by President Calvin Coolidge in 1925. The law allows businesses and organizations to privatize disputes involving discrimination.

The 2001 case â€” Circuit City Stores v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105 â€” involved an employee who was hired as a sales counselor for Circuit City. Under the company's terms of employment, the employment application included a provision requiring that all disputes be settled internally by arbitration.

In 1997, the employee filed a workplace discrimination suit against Circuit City, citing California state employment law violations. Circuit City took matters to the Federal District Court. The Court found that the arbitration agreement between the employee and employer was outlined in the job application.

Do I still have legal options if I experienced workplace discrimination?

Despite rescinding its policy statement, the EEOC stated that they continue to be "fully available to employees as an avenue to assert EEO rights and to investigate in the public interest, regardless of whether the parties have entered into an enforceable arbitration agreement."

Even if an employee enters into an arbitration agreement with an employer, he or she still has the right to bring incidents of discrimination to the attention of the EEOC. Furthermore, an arbitration agreement will not prevent legal action taken by the EEOC on behalf of the employee.

If you have experienced workplace discrimination due to race, gender, religion, age, ethnicity, or gender, it's critical that you take legal action. If you're seeking employment, the legal team at Nilges Draher LLC suggests reviewing all provisions on your job application. Even if you have entered into an arbitration agreement, you may still have legal options.

Contact our law firm to find out how we can help you. We offer free consultations. We also operate on a contingency fee basis, which means you don't pay us unless we win your case.

Posted in:

Related Posts

How to Document Employment Discrimination

You have the right to a workplace free of unlawful discrimination and harassment based on protected characteristics like race, national origin, sex, and religion. You also have legal recourse if those rights have been violated. However, the law doesn’t enforce itself; to hold your employer accountable, you need to document the unlawful behavior. Make sure you have the evidence to protect your rights at work The right documentation can make all the difference in a complicated employment discrimination case. Write down what happened, including the following: What was said and who said it If comments have been made at work related to your race, religion, gender, or another protected characteristic, who made those comments? Was it a supervisor or a coworker? Keep detailed records of those comments and each person’s rank in the corporate hierarchy. When comments were made and actions were taken Timing is critical in employment discrimination claims, for a few reasons. First, there are strict deadlines that apply to discrimination cases, so the timing of the discriminatory behavior or employment action can affect the amount of time you have to take legal action. Second, keeping records of time can help to establish patterns of behavior, which can be critical in your employment case. Who, if anyone, witnessed the discriminatory or harassing behavior Witnesses can play an important role in employment cases. They can verify what happened and provide powerful testimony in court if necessary. Make sure you write down the names and contact information of any witnesses so your lawyer can follow up with them later. Whether you reported the behavior, formally or informally Reporting discrimination or harassment puts your employer “on notice” that it’s happening under their watch. That’s why it’s important to keep a written record of any reports you made to a manager, human resources, or anyone else in charge in your workplace. You can make a report orally, but it’s best to put it in writing (a quick follow-up email will do) to ensure that you have a record of making the report. Make sure you keep records outside your employer’s systems It’s critical that you have your own records of the discriminatory or harassing behavior, outside your employer’s control. Keeping personal records ensures that you will have access to this information if your employer unexpectedly fires you or cuts off your access to their systems. In addition to records of the discrimination or harassment itself, make sure you keep copies of your performance reviews, communications from supervisors, and any other information that speaks to your overall job performance. If you are fired, demoted, reassigned, or otherwise targeted, your employer will likely try to argue their decision was related to a non-discriminatory reason such as job performance. If you can verify that you met or exceeded expectations in your job, you will be in a better position. Talk to an experienced employment lawyer today Again, employment discrimination cases can be complex, and there are strict deadlines that must be followed. That’s why getting legal representation as soon as possible is so important. If you believe you have been illegally discriminated against or harassed at work, contact Nilges Draher LLC in Ohio for a free case evaluation. With offices in North Canton, Cleveland, and Columbus, our employment attorneys offer legal representation to workers nationwide. "Was dealing with an issue and needed some advice, so I reached out to the firm. I got a callback within a half hour and was speaking to an attorney the very next day." — James W.

Employer Faces ADA Lawsuit for Denying Remote Work as an Accommodation

A recent lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sheds a light on a contentious issue in 21 st century workplaces: remote work as an accommodation for disabled workers. Under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), employers with 15 or more employees must provide reasonable accommodations for qualifying disabled workers and cannot retaliate or discriminate against workers who need accommodations. Disability accommodations are a complex and evolving area of law, however, so it’s always important to get legal advice and understand your rights and options. Our disability discrimination attorneys can help. What employers are and aren’t required to do to accommodate disabled workers According to the EEOC, employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations to qualifying individuals with disabilities. A “qualifying” worker is someone who can perform the essential functions of the job, with or without a reasonable accommodation. Note that under the ADA, employers are not required to provide the exact accommodation that an employee requires. For example, if an employee requests remote work as an accommodation, the employer might offer an alternative, such as allowing the employee to work in a different part of the office or a satellite location closer to home, depending on the nature of the disability and the reasons for the request. The key is that the employer must engage in an interactive process to find an accommodation that works for both parties. In the EEOC lawsuit filed in September, the employee, a customer service representative, asked to work from home after suffering a stroke, both because she couldn’t drive and because the lights in her employer’s office exacerbated the headaches she suffered from as a result of the stroke. The employer denied the accommodation and eventually fired the employee for taking leave to attend medical appointments. According to the EEOC, the employer violated the employee’s rights under the ADA by denying the accommodation and by retaliating against her. Key considerations in ADA cases In disability accommodation claims, including remote work accommodation claims, a key question is what the “essential functions of the job” are and whether the employee can perform them with or without accommodations. These “essential functions” are based on the employee's actual day-to-day job duties, not their written job description. For example, if the job description says, “must be able to lift 50 pounds,” but the actual job duties rarely, if ever, involve lifting heavy objects, then that is likely not an essential function of the job. Another key question is whether a particular accommodation is “reasonable.” In addition to remote or hybrid work, reasonable accommodations might include modified work hours, extra breaks or leave (paid or unpaid), assistive technology, accessible parking, modified work locations (such as a first-floor office for an employee who can’t climb stairs), and assistive technology. However, the employer is not required to make an accommodation that would represent an “undue hardship;” that is, a significant difficulty or expense for the employer. When there is a dispute over whether a particular accommodation is “reasonable,” one important consideration is whether the employer has already made the same accommodation for other employees (whether they are disabled or not). For example, if an employer has previously allowed hybrid or remote work for some workers, it’s much harder to argue that it would be an undue hardship to accommodate a disabled employee who requests remote work today. If you are facing disability discrimination, we can help Disabled workers face incredible challenges in the workplace, even though more accommodations are possible today than ever before. Too many employers don’t comply with the requirements of the ADA, and employees are left to suffer the consequences. If you’re in that situation, you have recourse. We can help. The experienced employment law attorneys at Nilges Draher LLC have recovered over $50 million (and counting) for workers in Ohio and beyond. Give us a call or contact us online for a free, confidential case evaluation.

U.S. Department of Labor Introduces Inclusive AI Hiring Guidelines

The U.S. Department of Labor has unveiled a new tool designed to make hiring practices more accessible and fairer for people with disabilities. The AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework can guide employers in using artificial intelligence to help rather than hinder disabled job seekers. Published by the Partnership on Employment & Accessible Technology (PEAT), the framework offers a blueprint for using AI hiring technology without unintentionally creating discriminatory barriers. This initiative was funded by the department's Office of Disability Employment Policy. What is the AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework? The AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework provides employers with guidelines to ensure they use their AI tools inclusively. This will help prevent bias from slipping through the cracks. With the rise of AI in hiring, the risk of overlooking qualified applicants due to poorly designed algorithms is real. PEAT's framework was built on best practices from the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework. The guidance helps employers see the benefits AI can bring to their hiring process while avoiding pitfalls that could harm applicants. ODEP and PEAT developed the framework in partnership with NIST. It also factored in feedback from disability advocates, AI experts, industry leaders, and the public. The framework outlines 10 areas of focus for employers to follow. Each area focuses on practices, goals, and activities that can help businesses adopt inclusive hiring initiatives. How will this framework promote inclusive hiring? The AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework came to life following a PEAT Think Tank held in April 2023. The development process included listening sessions with experts and input from a national online public dialogue. ODEP, PEAT, NIST, and other partners worked together to create a tool that both employers and workers can use. According to Assistant Secretary for Disability Employment Policy Taryn Williams, employers should use this framework to tap into the talent pool of people with disabilities. "The Office of Disability Employment Policy works with many employers eager to hire people with disabilities and benefit from their talents," Williams said. "These employers recognize that AI tools can improve recruitment and hiring but may also impact workplace culture and inclusion of disabled employees. The AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework published today charts a clear course for employers to navigate this transformation successfully." The framework doesn't just focus on employers. It's also there to empower job seekers, by helping them understand the benefits and challenges they may face when encountering AI-enabled hiring technologies. How does this framework align with equity? The framework aligns with the Biden-Harris administration's efforts to ensure AI technology supports, rather than hinders, workers' employment opportunities. In October 2022, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy released the "Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights." This document laid out standards for more equitable and inclusive digital hiring. The AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework takes those principles and puts them into action. This framework offers an important step forward for ensuring no qualified candidate is overlooked due to inaccessible or biased technology. It provides a practical, actionable guide for employers who are committed to making their hiring practices more equitable. What are my legal options if I face discrimination from employers? If you've faced discrimination during the hiring process in Ohio—whether because of a disability, race, gender, or any other protected status—you deserve justice. Discrimination isn't just wrong; it's illegal, and you have the right to stand up against it. Employers who misuse AI or other hiring practices to discriminate must be held accountable. The Ohio workplace discrimination lawyers at Nilges Draher LLC know how to take on companies that won't admit wrongdoing. We have the case results to prove it, including: A $5.9 million settlement for workers misclassified as outside salespersons and denied overtime pay. $4 million settlement for a class of workers not compensated for all break times. $1.25 million settlement for oil field workers improperly paid on a day rate without overtime compensation. Our legal team is here to listen, advocate, and fight for your rights. We operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we don't get paid unless you do, and your initial consultation is always free. Contact us today to schedule your case evaluation and take the first step toward protecting your rights.