Nilges Legal Group LLC

Blog / Posts

How Does A Tip Credit Work? Understanding Your Legal Rights Under Wage and Hour Laws

court hammer

Many restaurants save on labor costs by paying their tipped employees half of the minimum wage. This is called the “tip credit.” Tipped employees typically include servers and bartenders but could include other jobs too, if the employee customarily receives tips.

Employers are permitted to take advantage of this budget-saving partial exemption to the minimum wage requirements only if the employee still averages at least the minimum wage per hour when including the employee’s tips received.

For example, in Ohio, the minimum cash wage an employer can pay a tipped employee in 2023 is $5.05 per hour, as long as the employee's tips bring their total hourly earnings up to Ohio’s 2023 minimum wage of $10.10 per hour. The federal minimum wage is only $7.25, so the tip-credit rate is $2.13 per hour.

What is the 80/20 rule?

Some employers take this legal inch and stretch it into an illegal mile by having servers perform work that does not generate tips, yet, still pay the labor-cost saving “tip credit” rate.

For example, sometimes servers are required to spend substantial time performing duties that are related to the service of the customers, and therefore related to generating tips, such as “side work” like folding napkins and refilling condiments.

Unfortunately, some employers require the tipped employee to spend so much time doing this “side work” that it detracts from their main job: serving customers and earning tips. This practice could be illegal, depending on how much time is spent doing this “side work.”

The legal framework under which these claims are analyzed is commonly called the “80/20 rule.” This rule applies to tipped employees who perform both tipped and non-tipped duties during their shifts.

What are some examples of the 80/20 rule?

According to the 80/20 rule, if a tipped employee spends more than 20% of their shift performing non-tipped duties or tip-supporting “side work,” the employer must pay them the full minimum wage for those hours.

For example, if a server spends 30 minutes of their 2-hour shift bussing their tables, folding napkins, refilling condiments, etc., they may be entitled to the full minimum wage from their employer for that 30 minutes of work, even if they received tips during that time.

In addition to the 20% percentage threshold, the employer must pay the full minimum wage for any tip-supporting “side work” that exceeds 30 or more minutes at a time.

The 80/20 rule ensures that tipped employees are not taken advantage of by employers who try to use the tip credit mechanism to pay a lower wage for non-tipped work.

The 80/20 rule applies to both federal/FLSA and Ohio minimum wage law.

Also, some employers require tipped employees, such as servers, to open and close the restaurant when there are zero customers because the establishment is not yet open or closed for the day. Zero customers means zero tips.

Yet, some self-serving employers still enjoy the cost savings of paying the server the lower “tip-credit” rate even though there is zero chance the tipped employee can make any tips when opening and closing.

Tipped employees have legal rights

Indeed, some employers require their tipped employees to perform work that has nothing to do with tips generation, like general restaurant cleaning, or worse, cleaning bathrooms. Yet, the employer still takes the cost-saving route of paying the tipped employee the lower tip-credit rate.

In these situations, the tipped employee should be paid no less than the full minimum wage regardless of how much time is spent doing it. If the work has nothing to do with generating tips, then it should be paid at no less than the full minimum wage.

It's important to understand your rights as a tipped employee and to advocate for fair wages. Tipped employees are a vital part of the service industry and deserve to be compensated fairly for their hard work and dedication.

If you are a tipped employee that has to do opening or closing duties, or substantial side-work, but are paid less than the full minimum wage for that work, you should call for a free consultation to ensure you are being compensated fairly for your work.

Posted in:

Related Posts

How to Document Employment Discrimination

You have the right to a workplace free of unlawful discrimination and harassment based on protected characteristics like race, national origin, sex, and religion. You also have legal recourse if those rights have been violated. However, the law doesn’t enforce itself; to hold your employer accountable, you need to document the unlawful behavior. Make sure you have the evidence to protect your rights at work The right documentation can make all the difference in a complicated employment discrimination case. Write down what happened, including the following: What was said and who said it If comments have been made at work related to your race, religion, gender, or another protected characteristic, who made those comments? Was it a supervisor or a coworker? Keep detailed records of those comments and each person’s rank in the corporate hierarchy. When comments were made and actions were taken Timing is critical in employment discrimination claims, for a few reasons. First, there are strict deadlines that apply to discrimination cases, so the timing of the discriminatory behavior or employment action can affect the amount of time you have to take legal action. Second, keeping records of time can help to establish patterns of behavior, which can be critical in your employment case. Who, if anyone, witnessed the discriminatory or harassing behavior Witnesses can play an important role in employment cases. They can verify what happened and provide powerful testimony in court if necessary. Make sure you write down the names and contact information of any witnesses so your lawyer can follow up with them later. Whether you reported the behavior, formally or informally Reporting discrimination or harassment puts your employer “on notice” that it’s happening under their watch. That’s why it’s important to keep a written record of any reports you made to a manager, human resources, or anyone else in charge in your workplace. You can make a report orally, but it’s best to put it in writing (a quick follow-up email will do) to ensure that you have a record of making the report. Make sure you keep records outside your employer’s systems It’s critical that you have your own records of the discriminatory or harassing behavior, outside your employer’s control. Keeping personal records ensures that you will have access to this information if your employer unexpectedly fires you or cuts off your access to their systems. In addition to records of the discrimination or harassment itself, make sure you keep copies of your performance reviews, communications from supervisors, and any other information that speaks to your overall job performance. If you are fired, demoted, reassigned, or otherwise targeted, your employer will likely try to argue their decision was related to a non-discriminatory reason such as job performance. If you can verify that you met or exceeded expectations in your job, you will be in a better position. Talk to an experienced employment lawyer today Again, employment discrimination cases can be complex, and there are strict deadlines that must be followed. That’s why getting legal representation as soon as possible is so important. If you believe you have been illegally discriminated against or harassed at work, contact Nilges Draher LLC in Ohio for a free case evaluation. With offices in North Canton, Cleveland, and Columbus, our employment attorneys offer legal representation to workers nationwide. "Was dealing with an issue and needed some advice, so I reached out to the firm. I got a callback within a half hour and was speaking to an attorney the very next day." — James W.

Employer Faces ADA Lawsuit for Denying Remote Work as an Accommodation

A recent lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sheds a light on a contentious issue in 21 st century workplaces: remote work as an accommodation for disabled workers. Under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), employers with 15 or more employees must provide reasonable accommodations for qualifying disabled workers and cannot retaliate or discriminate against workers who need accommodations. Disability accommodations are a complex and evolving area of law, however, so it’s always important to get legal advice and understand your rights and options. Our disability discrimination attorneys can help. What employers are and aren’t required to do to accommodate disabled workers According to the EEOC, employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations to qualifying individuals with disabilities. A “qualifying” worker is someone who can perform the essential functions of the job, with or without a reasonable accommodation. Note that under the ADA, employers are not required to provide the exact accommodation that an employee requires. For example, if an employee requests remote work as an accommodation, the employer might offer an alternative, such as allowing the employee to work in a different part of the office or a satellite location closer to home, depending on the nature of the disability and the reasons for the request. The key is that the employer must engage in an interactive process to find an accommodation that works for both parties. In the EEOC lawsuit filed in September, the employee, a customer service representative, asked to work from home after suffering a stroke, both because she couldn’t drive and because the lights in her employer’s office exacerbated the headaches she suffered from as a result of the stroke. The employer denied the accommodation and eventually fired the employee for taking leave to attend medical appointments. According to the EEOC, the employer violated the employee’s rights under the ADA by denying the accommodation and by retaliating against her. Key considerations in ADA cases In disability accommodation claims, including remote work accommodation claims, a key question is what the “essential functions of the job” are and whether the employee can perform them with or without accommodations. These “essential functions” are based on the employee's actual day-to-day job duties, not their written job description. For example, if the job description says, “must be able to lift 50 pounds,” but the actual job duties rarely, if ever, involve lifting heavy objects, then that is likely not an essential function of the job. Another key question is whether a particular accommodation is “reasonable.” In addition to remote or hybrid work, reasonable accommodations might include modified work hours, extra breaks or leave (paid or unpaid), assistive technology, accessible parking, modified work locations (such as a first-floor office for an employee who can’t climb stairs), and assistive technology. However, the employer is not required to make an accommodation that would represent an “undue hardship;” that is, a significant difficulty or expense for the employer. When there is a dispute over whether a particular accommodation is “reasonable,” one important consideration is whether the employer has already made the same accommodation for other employees (whether they are disabled or not). For example, if an employer has previously allowed hybrid or remote work for some workers, it’s much harder to argue that it would be an undue hardship to accommodate a disabled employee who requests remote work today. If you are facing disability discrimination, we can help Disabled workers face incredible challenges in the workplace, even though more accommodations are possible today than ever before. Too many employers don’t comply with the requirements of the ADA, and employees are left to suffer the consequences. If you’re in that situation, you have recourse. We can help. The experienced employment law attorneys at Nilges Draher LLC have recovered over $50 million (and counting) for workers in Ohio and beyond. Give us a call or contact us online for a free, confidential case evaluation.

U.S. Department of Labor Introduces Inclusive AI Hiring Guidelines

The U.S. Department of Labor has unveiled a new tool designed to make hiring practices more accessible and fairer for people with disabilities. The AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework can guide employers in using artificial intelligence to help rather than hinder disabled job seekers. Published by the Partnership on Employment & Accessible Technology (PEAT), the framework offers a blueprint for using AI hiring technology without unintentionally creating discriminatory barriers. This initiative was funded by the department's Office of Disability Employment Policy. What is the AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework? The AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework provides employers with guidelines to ensure they use their AI tools inclusively. This will help prevent bias from slipping through the cracks. With the rise of AI in hiring, the risk of overlooking qualified applicants due to poorly designed algorithms is real. PEAT's framework was built on best practices from the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework. The guidance helps employers see the benefits AI can bring to their hiring process while avoiding pitfalls that could harm applicants. ODEP and PEAT developed the framework in partnership with NIST. It also factored in feedback from disability advocates, AI experts, industry leaders, and the public. The framework outlines 10 areas of focus for employers to follow. Each area focuses on practices, goals, and activities that can help businesses adopt inclusive hiring initiatives. How will this framework promote inclusive hiring? The AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework came to life following a PEAT Think Tank held in April 2023. The development process included listening sessions with experts and input from a national online public dialogue. ODEP, PEAT, NIST, and other partners worked together to create a tool that both employers and workers can use. According to Assistant Secretary for Disability Employment Policy Taryn Williams, employers should use this framework to tap into the talent pool of people with disabilities. "The Office of Disability Employment Policy works with many employers eager to hire people with disabilities and benefit from their talents," Williams said. "These employers recognize that AI tools can improve recruitment and hiring but may also impact workplace culture and inclusion of disabled employees. The AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework published today charts a clear course for employers to navigate this transformation successfully." The framework doesn't just focus on employers. It's also there to empower job seekers, by helping them understand the benefits and challenges they may face when encountering AI-enabled hiring technologies. How does this framework align with equity? The framework aligns with the Biden-Harris administration's efforts to ensure AI technology supports, rather than hinders, workers' employment opportunities. In October 2022, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy released the "Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights." This document laid out standards for more equitable and inclusive digital hiring. The AI & Inclusive Hiring Framework takes those principles and puts them into action. This framework offers an important step forward for ensuring no qualified candidate is overlooked due to inaccessible or biased technology. It provides a practical, actionable guide for employers who are committed to making their hiring practices more equitable. What are my legal options if I face discrimination from employers? If you've faced discrimination during the hiring process in Ohio—whether because of a disability, race, gender, or any other protected status—you deserve justice. Discrimination isn't just wrong; it's illegal, and you have the right to stand up against it. Employers who misuse AI or other hiring practices to discriminate must be held accountable. The Ohio workplace discrimination lawyers at Nilges Draher LLC know how to take on companies that won't admit wrongdoing. We have the case results to prove it, including: A $5.9 million settlement for workers misclassified as outside salespersons and denied overtime pay. $4 million settlement for a class of workers not compensated for all break times. $1.25 million settlement for oil field workers improperly paid on a day rate without overtime compensation. Our legal team is here to listen, advocate, and fight for your rights. We operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we don't get paid unless you do, and your initial consultation is always free. Contact us today to schedule your case evaluation and take the first step toward protecting your rights.