330-470-4428
330-470-4428
Massillon, OH Cleveland, OH Columbus, OH

Current Class and Collective Actions

Our Ohio employment law attorneys work for you

“This not only helped me but thousands of other people who were being taken advantage of.” – Sherry M.

Most of the wage law cases we handle at Nilges Draher LLC involve class actions and collective actions. This means that the employer has an illegal pay practice that applies to a group of similarly situated employees who have collectively acted against their employer.

We have earned the respect of our adversaries and of the courts as “abled and experienced counsel” in these types of cases. We have been successful in resolving many of these cases before filing a lawsuit. That’s because our adversaries take us seriously.

Class action and collective action cases we are currently handling

Ballard et al. v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC: Our firm represents a class of correctional and detention officers who work or worked for CoreCivic throughout the country, excluding California. In this case, the Named Plaintiff alleges that Plaintiff and other similarly situated employees were not paid for pre-shift security screenings, which resulted in the underpayment of overtime.

Clark v. International Automotive Components Group North America, Inc. – Our firm seeks to represent a class of employees who work or worked for International Automotive Components Group North America, Inc. Named Plaintiff alleges that Plaintiff and other similarly situated employees were not compensated for pre-shift meetings and other similar work resulting in the miscalculation and underpayment of overtime compensation.

Cleveland v. Foundations Health Solutions - Our firm seeks to represent all current and former full time STNAs who were not paid for the time they spent working during their unpaid meal breaks.

Cordell v. Sugar Creek Packing Co. - Our firm seeks to represent a class of current and former employees who engaged in handwashing, donning of sanitary gear, and/or related travel.

Eisenberg v. Conrad’s Tire Service – Our firm seeks to represent a class of present and former full-time employees with the title manager who were not Store Leaders and who were not paid overtime compensation as a result of Defendant’s misclassification of them as exempt from overtime.

Elam v. Gardner Pie Co. - Our firm seeks to represent a class of former and current full-time hourly employees who were not paid for the time they spent putting on and removing required sanitary gear.

Fassa v. P&E Express Inc. – Our firm seeks to represent a class of current and former delivery drivers who were not paid overtime compensation for all hours worked in excess of 40 in at least one workweek.

Fitzgerald v. Forest River Manufacturing LLC – Our firm, along with Hassler Kondras Miller LLP and Coffman Legal, seek to represent a class of current and former piece rate employees who were not paid for all hours worked.

Forrester v. American Security and Protection – Our firm seeks to represent a class of security workers who were not paid for pre-shift pass down time resulting in the underpayment of overtime hours.

Fuller v. 1st Choice Family Services, Inc. – Our firm seeks to represent a class of current and former Direct Support Professionals who were misclassified as independent contractors and who were not paid overtime compensation.

Howard v. Berry Global – Our firm, along with the law firm of Hassler Kondras Miller LLP, seek to represent a class of manufacturing employees who work or worked for Berry Global.  Named Plaintiff alleges that he and other similarly situated employees were not paid for all hours worked.

Jim v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC - Our firm, along with Hodges & Foty, LLP, and The Lazzaro Law Firm, LLC, seek to represent a class of correctional and detention officers who work or worked for CoreCivic in New Mexico. In this case, the Named Plaintiff alleges that Plaintiff and other similarly situated employees were not paid for pre-shift security screenings, which resulted in the underpayment of overtime.

Kain v. ENV Services – Our firm along with Coffman Legal seeks to represent a class of current and former field service technicians.  Named Plaintiff alleges that he and other similarly situated employees who were not paid for hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a workweek.

Kasiotis v. AWP, Inc. d/b/a Area Wide Protective: Our firm seeks to represent a class of employees who work or worked for AWP as traffic control specialists. In this case, the Named Plaintiffs allege that they were not paid for time spent driving other traffic control specialists to and from jobsites, and associated inspections and other related work, resulting in the underpayment of overtime compensation.

Kovacs v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. – Our firm, along with the law firm, Nilges Draher Vaught, seek to represent a class of security guards who were not paid for pre-shift duties resulting in the underpayment of overtime.

Lambert v. G Matss LLC, et al.: Our firm represents a class of employees defined as former and current non-salaried employees who were employed at Defendants’ business locations in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Virginia and who worked more than 40 hours in any workweek from December 17, 2015 to the present. In this case, the Named Plaintiff alleges that Defendants did not pay overtime at a rate of one and one-half times employees’ regular rates.

Logan v. United American Security, LLC d/b/a GardaWorld Security Services – Our firm seeks to represent a class of current and former security guards that were required to arrive 10-15 minutes prior to their scheduled shift to complete shift change duties.  Named Plaintiff alleges that he and other similarly situated security guards were not paid for this time resulting in the underpayment of overtime compensation.

Lopez v. Silfex, Inc. – Our firm, along with the Lazzaro Law Firm, seek to represent a class of current and former manufacturing employees who were not paid for pre- and post-shift pass-down work resulting in the underpayment of overtime compensation.

Martinez v. MPower Energy – Our firm seeks to represent a class of current and former Sales and Marketing Representatives (or other employees of Defendant who have similar job titles or perform similar job duties) who were employed by Defendant and who were not paid overtime compensation.

Purvis v. OSL Retail Services – Our firm seeks to represent all current and former Team Leads who worked 40 or more hours a week and were not paid for attending meetings or using the GroupMe application while not at work.

Rapp v. Axt Home Care – Our firm seeks to represent a class of present and former full-time hourly home health workers that were not paid for paid for time spent traveling to multiple locations in one workday.

Ray v. Hercules Tree Services, LLC – Our firm seeks to represent a class of present and former full time hourly employees that were misclassified as independent contractors and who were not paid overtime compensation.

Sirmons, et al. v. Star Multi Care, et al. – Our firm seeks to represent a class of LPNs, STNAs and/or Home Health Aids, who were not paid location-to-location travel time resulting in the underpayment of overtime wages.

Spencer v. Legacy Health Services - Our firm seeks to represent all current and former full time STNAs who were not paid for the time they spent working during their unpaid meal breaks.

Storrs v. The Federal Metal Company - Our firm seeks to represent a class of former and current full-time hourly production and manufacturing employees who were not paid for the time they spent putting on and removing required uniforms and other protective equipment.

Thomas v. Amazon: Our firm seeks to represent a class of employees who work or worked for Amazon as warehouse workers in Amazon Fulfillment Centers in Ohio.  Named Plaintiff alleges that Plaintiff and other similarly situated employees were not paid for a mandatory screening process shift resulting in the underpayment of overtime.

Thompson Clevenger, et al. v. SMCS Services, Inc. d/b/a Star Multi Care Co., et al. – Our firm seeks to represent a class of current and form employees who were not paid for pre- and post-shift shift-change duties.

Wyse v. Sauder Woodworking Co. – Our firm seeks to represent a class of former and current full-time manufacturing employees who were not paid for all hours worked.

Massillon Office

7266 Portage Street NW
Suite D
Massillon, OH 44646
Phone: 330-470-4428
Fax: 330-754-1430

Cleveland Office

1360 East 9th Street
Suite 808
Cleveland, OH 44114
Phone: 216-230-2955
Fax: 330-754-1430

Columbus Office

34 N. High Street
Suite 502
Columbus, OH 43215
Phone: 614-824-5770
Fax: 330-754-1430

Book YourFree Consultation Contact UsNow
Free Case Consultation

    To schedule your free consultation, please fill out this form and one of our legal professionals will contact you.